Meanwhile…

Posted Tue,6 June, 2006 by thatgayconservative
Categories: History, Personal Note

While some worry about themselves and the Marriage Protection Act (or whatever the hell it is), some of us will be remembering those who did their part to save the world 62 years ago today.

In case some of you forgot, this is the anniversary of the D-Day Invasion where the allies drove a huge nail in the coffin of a REAL fascist, Nazi dictator.

Advertisements

Confrused.

Posted Tue,6 June, 2006 by thatgayconservative
Categories: Iraq, Kooks, Liberals, Team Killing Fucktards, War On Terror

Now as you may know, I'm one of the first to admit that I'm not as "nuanced" as our liberals are. Still, I'm hoping that somebody out there can explain to me how slandering our military (e.g. Haditha, Club Gitmo, Abu Grahib etc.) is considered "supporting the troops".

Further, how exactly is demanding our surrender and capitulating to the terrorists (e.g. lord BJ & The Mog, which brought about 9/11) "supports the troops". Not only that, how exactly does turning tail and running away going to help "our international image", since the only ones who might admire that would be our "allies" and douchebags, the French?

Why, exactly, should I believe a team killing fucktard Representative from PA. who SHITS on his brothers and calls that support? With support like that (and the traitorous media leaks) from the libs, who the hell needs enemies? No matter how much you polish a turd, Mr. Murtha, it's still a turd.

It's very clear that the libs would sacrifice their country and their defenders, even so far as to practically demand another terrorist attack, just to get their birthright of political power back. So when these douchebags tell you that they "support the troops" and they're more patriotic than you are, just beg them not to. We can't afford their "support" anymore.

Misspoke My Ass!

Posted Sun,4 June, 2006 by thatgayconservative
Categories: 2006 Campaign, Kooks, Liberals

Busby on defense, says she misspoke

If an election can turn on a sentence, this could be the one: “You don't need papers for voting.”

On Thursday night, Francine Busby, the Democratic candidate for the 50th Congressional District, was speaking before a largely Latino crowd in Escondido when she uttered those words. She said yesterday she simply misspoke.

It's interesting that whenever libs are caught, they merely "misspoke". Another good example would be the incredibly moronic Alan Hevesi. It's all good at the moment and the libs are cheered at the time, but when they realize how bad they screwed themselves then "why I misspoke" and all is supposd to be forgiven and forgotten. Nevermind that libs count on you to be too damn stupid to remember what they've said.

What's worse is that Ms. Busby is denying what she believes. Libs don't believe in accountability and don't believe you should have to provide any evidence that you are who you say you are when you vote. Hell, history shows libs don't even care if you're alive or not. They don't care how many times you vote or where. However, they play fast and loose with allegations of Republicans screwing with the polls. That's the smoke screen to cover their own treachery though.

If Republicans had made these comments, there would be no end to the lib's bitching. It's another fine example of the liberals' hypocrisy. I've always said that when libs start pointing their fingers, it's best to look in the opposite direction.

Fill In The Blank

Posted Sat,3 June, 2006 by thatgayconservative
Categories: Kooks, Liberals

So if no WMDs were found in Iraq means that Bush lied, then that obviously means that since no CIA "Black Prisons" were found means that the liberals __________.

Libs Don’t Care

Posted Fri,2 June, 2006 by thatgayconservative
Categories: Kooks, Liberals

Talked

Libs will sacrifice you and this country to regain power.

Media Myths On Katrina

Posted Wed,31 May, 2006 by thatgayconservative
Categories: Katrina, Kooks, Liberals, Media

I find it interesting that libs demand apologies from Republicans for "lying", but they have ZERO interest in demanding the same from themselves or their media lap dogs when they lie. Cases in point: Dan Rather's so-called "documents" which supposedly proved Bush was AWOL and worse than that, any and all coverage of hurricane Katrina by their bitches in the media. It goes to show that libs don't give a damn about the truth and if they're proven to be liars, they ignore it and go about their business of smearing anybody in their path.

Check this out:

Media Myths On Katrina includes an article by Popular Mechanics dispelling the liberal media lies. Here's my favorite:

GOVERNMENT RESPONDED RAPIDLY MYTH:

"The aftermath of Katrina will go down as one of the worst abandonments of Americans on American soil ever in U.S. history."–Aaron Broussard, president, Jefferson Parish, La., Meet the Press, NBC, Sept. 4, 2005

REALITY: Bumbling by top disaster-management officials fueled a perception of general inaction, one that was compounded by impassioned news anchors. In fact, the response to Hurricane Katrina was by far the largest–and fastest-rescue effort in U.S. history, with nearly 100,000 emergency personnel arriving on the scene within three days of the storm's landfall.

Dozens of National Guard and Coast Guard helicopters flew rescue operations that first day–some just 2 hours after Katrina hit the coast. Hoistless Army helicopters improvised rescues, carefully hovering on rooftops to pick up survivors. On the ground, "guardsmen had to chop their way through, moving trees and recreating roadways," says Jack Harrison of the National Guard. By the end of the week, 50,000 National Guard troops in the Gulf Coast region had saved 17,000 people; 4000 Coast Guard personnel saved more than 33,000.

These units had help from local, state and national responders, including five helicopters from the Navy ship Bataan and choppers from the Air Force and police. The Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries dispatched 250 agents in boats. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), state police and sheriffs' departments launched rescue flotillas. By Wednesday morning, volunteers and national teams joined the effort, including eight units from California's Swift Water Rescue. By Sept. 8, the waterborne operation had rescued 20,000.

While the press focused on FEMA's shortcomings, this broad array of local, state and national responders pulled off an extraordinary success–especially given the huge area devastated by the storm. Computer simulations of a Katrina-strength hurricane had estimated a worst-case-scenario death toll of more than 60,000 people in Louisiana. The actual number was 1077 in that state.

 NEXT TIME: Any fatalities are too many. Improvements hinge on building more robust communications networks and stepping up predisaster planning to better coordinate local and national resources.

PM PRESCRIPTION Improving Response

 ONE OF THE BIGGEST reminders from Katrina is that FEMA is not a first responder. It was local and state agencies that got there first and saved lives. Where the feds can contribute is in planning and helping to pay for a coordinated response. Here are a few concrete steps.

My point has been that there were rescue efforts in effect even before the storm had passed. There was an article in Firehouse Magazine which mentioned that while Mississippi was still being hammered, FEMA USAR teams were already moving into south Louisiana and beginning rescue operations. Heckuva job, Brownie! Meanwhile, where were the liberal douchebag Katrina Chickens??? Nowhere.

Considering how their bitches in the media reported on the storm's aftermath and the posing and race baiting from the left, I can say without a doubt that the liberals can shove it sideways on the Katrina issue.

Additionally, the libs got all wrapped up in politicizing the issue wound up shitting all over the rescuers in the process. Way to go, FAGS! They were too busy pissing themselves for not being able to photograph dead bodies in the water to give a damn about those who were rescued and the rescuers. They were too busy spooging themselves because Sean Penn (F.A.G.) did what to help out?

Wait. WHO Lied???????

Posted Sun,28 May, 2006 by thatgayconservative
Categories: Current Events, Iraq, Kooks, Liberals

Who Thought Iraq Had WMD? Most Everybody
By Larry ElderMay 25, 2006

As Memorial Day approaches, 51 percent of Americans, according to a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll, think the commander in chief "deliberately misled" us about Iraq and weapons of mass destruction. "Deliberately misled"? Once again, let's go to the videotape:

Clinton Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, February 1998: "Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."

Clinton National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, February 1998: "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has 10 times since 1983."

Portuguese Prime Minister Jose Manuel Durao Barroso, October 2003: "When [former President Bill] Clinton was here recently he told me was absolutely convinced, given his years in the White House and the access to privileged information which he had, that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction until the end of the Saddam regime."

French President Jacques Chirac, February 2003: "There is a problem — the probable possession of weapons of mass destruction by an uncontrollable country, Iraq. The international community is right . . . in having decided Iraq should be disarmed."

President Bill Clinton, December 1998: "Other countries possess weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. With Saddam, there is one big difference: He has used them, not once, but repeatedly — unleashing chemical weapons against Iranian troops during a decade-long war, not only against soldiers, but against civilians; firing Scud missiles at the citizens of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Iran. Not only against a foreign enemy, but even against his own people, gassing Kurdish civilians in Northern Iraq. . . . I have no doubt today that, left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again. . . . "

Read the rest of this post »