Yeah. So I was writing this article the other day on the Rove issue and the libs indictment fantasy. Problem was that every time I tried to save it, it would disappear.
Long story short, I need to buy a new keyboard for my computer and I will most likely be returning to Blogger.
Thanks for nothing, WP.
Ann Coulter Banned in New Jersey?
Two New Jersey Democrats are pushing to have Ann Coulter's new book "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," banned from all bookstores in their state because she criticized four 9/11 widows known as "the Jersey Girls."
Wait! Who is it, exactly, trying to suppress free speech? I thought it was supposed to be Bush. As it turns out, the kook, team killing fucktards on the left are responsible. Don't believe me????
Ward Churchill still has a job and nobody's legislating against him. Maybe that's what needs to be done. Since nobody has the guts to nail the liberals for treason and sedition, maybe we should pass legislation ordering them to shut the hell up and stop supporting the enemy?
I'm sure that if Coulter had called the Jersey Bitches Little Eichmanns, the liberals would still be spooging themselves.
Only one word applies here.
HYPOCRISY!!!
You get fresh steaming piles like this:
Are you Ann Coulter without the shitty-looking drag?
Well, sweetie, I've seen many a drag show from Brandon, FL to Laredo, TX. and I can promise you that the shittiest-looking drag I've ever seen was on Cindy Sheehan and Susan Estrich. That's a major toss up, though, as to who is the winner. And then there's Hillary and Maureen Dowd, but given that they are lesbians, it doesn't really count as drag.
Cindy's pics grinding on the Reverennnnnnd Jacksonnnnn and tongue fighting with Hugo was, without a doubt, the most nauseating thing I've ever seen (and I've been in emergency services & body collection for over a decade).
Ooops! Almost forgot Mr. Janet Reno. Enjoy your finger-banging with those mental images. I shall be praying at the porcelain alter.
So al-Zarqawi (bin Laden's left nut) is toast.
Look for the liberals, kooks and team killing fucktards to spend the rest of the weak and this weekend, at least, lamenting the fact. Not only that, but the Washington liberals and pundits will be clamoring all over each other to get on TV to proclaim how this means and changes nothing. After all, Bush is the true enemy of the U.S. and the military is nothing but liars and murderers anyway.
I suspect that by the time the Sunday talk shows are over, it will be no big deal and by the time the news cycle starts on Monday, nobody will be talking about it. I'm almost willing to bet a paycheck on my predictions.
Good job, FAGs.
Now as you may know, I'm one of the first to admit that I'm not as "nuanced" as our liberals are. Still, I'm hoping that somebody out there can explain to me how slandering our military (e.g. Haditha, Club Gitmo, Abu Grahib etc.) is considered "supporting the troops".
Further, how exactly is demanding our surrender and capitulating to the terrorists (e.g. lord BJ & The Mog, which brought about 9/11) "supports the troops". Not only that, how exactly does turning tail and running away going to help "our international image", since the only ones who might admire that would be our "allies" and douchebags, the French?
Why, exactly, should I believe a team killing fucktard Representative from PA. who SHITS on his brothers and calls that support? With support like that (and the traitorous media leaks) from the libs, who the hell needs enemies? No matter how much you polish a turd, Mr. Murtha, it's still a turd.
It's very clear that the libs would sacrifice their country and their defenders, even so far as to practically demand another terrorist attack, just to get their birthright of political power back. So when these douchebags tell you that they "support the troops" and they're more patriotic than you are, just beg them not to. We can't afford their "support" anymore.
ThatGayConservative 
You must be logged in to post a comment.