Archive for March 2006

An Agenda!

Fri,31 March, 2006

Brilliant. However, I would change the exclamation point to a question mark. To suggest that the libs have something someone calls an “agenda” is, at the very least, laughable.

And despite the lack of an agenda, I’m supposed to grab my ankles and vote for them. Yeah. Right.

You terrorists out there listening and watching this, watch out! The Democratic Party is coming after you; they have a new agenda. New York’s other senator, Chuckie Schumer, said that his party will “take back the security issue.” If they win Congress, Democrats say they are going to catch Osama bin Laden. Yeah, the bin Laden that Bill Clinton let slip through his fingers (two or three times). Democrats say they are going to increase the number of spies, double the number of troops in Special Forces, and be real “tough and “smart,” says their senate leader “Dingy” Harry Reid. Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic house leader, said they are going to be “strong” and “smart;” she forgot to say “tough.” Yes, my friends; Democrats are going to get Osama. Really? Look at their track record. They’ll stop spying on terrorists phoning into America, for starters. And even though Dingy Harry claimed that Democrats killed the Patriot Act, it passed. Give them a chance, elect them, and they’ll really kill it next time. Democrats want to cut and run from terrorists in Iraq — Pelosi backed John Murtha’s call for immediate withdrawal because they think we lost the war. And believe this! Democrats will make sure that enemy combatants — terrorists — have their legal “rights” protected with the Al-Qaeda Bill of Rights, and that our interrogators won’t treat them badly. (Like making them stay awake to answer questions.) Oh, and Democrats will vote for funding our troops… before they vote against it. And if you doubt their commitment, consider this. The day they announced their security agenda, Democrat Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney slugged a Capitol Police officer who asked her for some identification. Yeah. Democrats will take back security — back to the stone ages…if you’re dumb enough to ever give them a chance to regain power.

Rush’s Morning Update

Pardon me, but wasn’t it the libs who forbade the CIA from using spies and sources?


Even More Bad News For Libs!

Fri,31 March, 2006

Oh Snap!

FISA judges say Bush within law

A panel of former Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judges yesterday told members of the Senate Judiciary Committee that President Bush did not act illegally when he created by executive order a wiretapping program conducted by the National Security Agency (NSA).
    The five judges testifying before the committee said they could not speak specifically to the NSA listening program without being briefed on it, but that a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act does not override the president’s constitutional authority to spy on suspected international agents under executive order.
    “If a court refuses a FISA application and there is not sufficient time for the president to go to the court of review, the president can under executive order act unilaterally, which he is doing now,” said Judge Allan Kornblum, magistrate judge of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida and an author of the 1978 FISA Act. “I think that the president would be remiss exercising his constitutional authority by giving all of that power over to a statute.”

Read the rest at the title link above.

HT: James Taranto @ OpinionJournal Best of the Web

So not only was the NSA surveillance <i>approved</i> by the FISA Court of Review, it’s been shown to be legal via testimony of former FISA judges.

But, of course, this won’t matter a damn to the libs. They’ll still push to punish President Bush for working to protect the country. And why? Revenge. Blind, unadultrated, petty, juvenile revenge.

“Baghdad Jim” McDermott (D, Hussein) Spanked in Court

Wed,29 March, 2006

From the ASSociated Press:Congressman Loses Appeal in Phone Taping

So apparently, a raving lib ass clown like “Baghdad Jim” McDermott (D, Hussein) can’t violate the Constitution and leak private phone conversations to the DNC Times. It appears that the Constitution applies to Republicans too <Gasp!> Whodathunkit?Meanwhile, President Bush is still not allowed to monitor phone calls from al-Qaeda to the U.S. nor connect any dots that might prevent a future attack.

We should be hearing censure demands from Puss Feingold by now. Any moment now. Waiting….Waiting…Any moment.

Anywho, here’s some of my favorite excerpts from the article:

Lawyers for 18 news organizations – including ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, The Associated Press, The New York Times and The Washington Post – filed a brief backing McDermott.

Well imagine that. The liberal media is sticking up for “Baghdad Jim” in the matter. I wonder, would the liberal media go so far to help a Republican president in protecting our national security. Nah. They could give two shits about that.

A spokesman for McDermott said Tuesday the congressman had just received the ruling and was studying it.

What’s to study? You fucked up! You thought you were above the law and that everybody would gleefully suck your cock in the matter because you’re an elitist liberal. YOU’RE the one who didn’t think that the law applied to you because, by God, you had Republicans “lying” on tape. Nevermind how you got it, you smug, arrogant prick.

Look, grow up. Let your balls decend and admit that you're wrong. We know you won't really be punished for it. So you'll be out a few thousand dollars. Who cares? You'll phone up some of your buds and have it paid off in no time with no record to boot. Hell, surely you have some cash from Uncle Sugar Saddam laying around gathering dust.

Look, this is no biggie. You can go right back to your job of being an arrogant, elitist, liberal douchebag in no time. Why, this sort of thing looks great on a liberal Senator's resume, after all. Just please stop pissing all over the law.

Tell me again, who demonstrates a "culture of corruption"?


Either Way, The Northeast Blows.

Tue,28 March, 2006

Forecasts: Northeast Due for Big Hurricane

Why does the wind blow so hard in the South?

Because the North sucks.

My question is this:

Will the governors in the NE swallow their elitist pride and ask Jeb or Barbour how to deal with the storms, or will they rely on the failures of Gov. Kathleen "I should have asked for the military sooner" Blankcheck?

I suspect they'll sit in the mud and whine, piss and moan for government gimmes like Sen. Landrieu.
HT: Drudge

Surprise, Surprise, Surprise!

Tue,28 March, 2006

Some Marines Declining Extra Body Armor

Imagine that. I've been saying that for about as long as libs have been trying to score political points on this issue. They're too hot, heavy and gets in the way.

Another interesting fact is that a lot of the troops over there don't want the "up-armored" Humvees. They say it slows them down especially if they wind up in a situation where they need to get out quickly. There's a reason why those Humvees weren't armored in the first place. Frankly, I'm surprised no liberal douchebag hasn't suggested wrapping our troops in jumbo bubble wrap.

So my question is why the libs don't just shut their gob holes and listen to the troops? Quit relying on fake polls, CBS-BS News and whiney soldiers on johnny detail in the green zone. There's usually a reason their on johnny detail too. Quit finding people who couldn't pour piss out of a boot with the instructions written on the heel and prop them up as "experts". Quit telling them what they want.

Keep in mind, the folks who whined the most about body armor and "up-armored" Humvees are pretty much the same people who denied the Spec-Op's request for more armor & gunships in the Mog. FYI: You DO NOT deny Spec-Op's request for anything.

HT: Drudge

Update: Here's some articles I found on my other blog from January.

Use of More Armor Questioned

Many Iraq Deaths Blamed on Body Armor

But you don't have to take my word for it.

Bush Lied???

Mon,27 March, 2006

Seems to me, with all these documents coming to light, that it's actually the liberal left who's been lying all along. No surprises there since they've been falling all over themselves trying to prove that Bush is the only enemy we have.

 But, of course, I've been saying all along that it's the libs who're lying. While they've been busy spooging all over themselves over the fact that the WMDs weren't in Iraq, none could have been bothered to ask where they went. Nah. That would be piss in their Bush bashing Cheerios.

Oh, and it turns out that their spooge-fest that UBL & Hussein would never have anything to do with each other is a lie too. Go figure. Those of us with any interest in the truth knew better. Those who wanted to pretend to know the truth…well…wound up looking like the ass clowns they are.

Another lie the left heaped on the fire.Why the hell am I supposed to vote for them again?

As a gay man, I'm expected to vote straight-ticket "Democrat" (I missed that rule in my Gay orientation but found out later), and yet I still can't find any reason to vote for these miserable failures.



Sat,25 March, 2006